<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>David Crow - Latest Comments in Groundswell: Application to Gauge Social Networks Attitudes</title><link>http://davidcrow.disqus.com/</link><description>David Crow helping startups with product strategy, marketing, user experience design, and technology development.</description><atom:link href="https://davidcrow.disqus.com/groundswell_application_to_gauge_social_networks_attitudes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:35:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Groundswell: Application to Gauge Social Networks Attitudes</title><link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/6698/groundswell-application-to-gauge-social-networks-attitudes#comment-21174736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I first read that headline I thought it said Application to *Gouge* Social Networks&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  file under the social graft/graph/gaffe etc. ;)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  I like this ladder model but I think there&amp;amp;#039;s one key factor that&amp;amp;#039;s missing and that&amp;amp;#039;s the tone of contributions. What are the quality and not just quantity of participation. How much snark/trolling/bashing is there relative to constructive contribution. It&amp;amp;#039;s hard to measure that empirically. Or maybe not?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  Maybe best you could do is some automated Godwin metric? community godwin-index = avg thread length / first accusation of somebody being a nazi etc.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  Or perhaps some clever bayesian algorithm to index exactly how closely any given contribution resembles the average YouTube comment. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  What percentage of of outbound links do not actually point only to rick-astley-related video content? (twitter would score low...)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Purves</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>